data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccdc1/ccdc1049aba01e92be7e1c753d4607efb80720a4" alt="Personal backup device not recognized"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe97d/fe97d0017e88eb00ee2273d5fb0a21ee11e1daa4" alt="personal backup device not recognized personal backup device not recognized"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80964/8096477d82b1f9f5f68eaa168e6160ed8431b41c" alt="personal backup device not recognized personal backup device not recognized"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82fbe/82fbee1597a8913ef085be40499d5c2d8dde330f" alt="personal backup device not recognized personal backup device not recognized"
Yes it can be used as a backup destination, but the redundancy is not a backup in itself. So in that vein, I am retitling the post. THIS IS NOT A BACKUP SYSTEM.This was the point I was trying to make. What I am trying to say is that many people use a RAID as their primary storage system, and have it configured either as a RAID 1 or 5, thinking that the redundancy of the RAID is a backup. It is possible I did not make clear what I was trying to convey about RAID.ĪNOTHER NOTE: I have redesigned the site and for some reason, the comments are not showing. NOTE: Over the past few years, I have received a lot of messages and comments about this post.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccdc1/ccdc1049aba01e92be7e1c753d4607efb80720a4" alt="Personal backup device not recognized"